Schiller v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.
Plaintiff seeks by way of the first cause of action to compel the reinstatement of a certain policy of accident and health insurance heretofore issued to him by the defendant’s predecessor. The complaint alleges that plaintiff paid all premiums due under the policy “up to January 12, 1937;” that since August, 1937, plaintiff “ has been totally disabled and by reason of his age and present physical condition, is and will continue to be unable to procure any other health or disability insurance;” that the defendant has declared the policy “ lapsed and forfeited by it for non-payment of the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Scherman v. Empire Mutual InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
- Schiller v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940