Legal Opinion

Hines v. Villalba

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 15, 2007No. 05-06-00256-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice RICHTER.

Bruce Hines appeals the trial court’s entry of a post-judgment protective order which provided that Hines was not entitled to recover conditional appellate attorney’s fees from Phillip and Veronica Villalba. In a single multi-part issue, Hines asserts that the trial court erred because the order was entered after the expiration of the trial court’s plenary power and the conditions requisite to the recovery of appellate attorney’s fees had already occurred. For the reasons below, we resolve Hines’ issue against him, and affirm the trial court’s order.

I.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lane Bank Equipment Co. v. Smith Southern Equipment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dream Creek Enterprises, Inc. and Ramey J. Keith v. BBL Builders, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  2. Michael Grishman v. Roger Sims, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
  3. Novo Point, LLC and Quantec, LLC v. Elissa Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
  4. in Re Dee Ann Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. in Re Dee Ann Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API