Latz v. Blumenthal
New York Supreme Court
Demuebeb to separate defense.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
Herman B. Blumenthal and Solomon Blumenthal were copartners, and the cause of action is based on a copartnership. contract. Both were named as defendants in the summons and complaint, but service of process was made on Herman B. Blumenthal only, who died without service having been made on the other defendant and before the action had been brought to trial. Subsequently to the death of Herman, however, the other defendant voluntarily appeared in the action. In his answer he sets up a separate defense, to the effect that the action abated on the *408death of Herman B. Blumenthal. Assuming this to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnes v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Potts v. . DounceNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Breed v. . RuoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Taylor v. ChurchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1854