Legal Opinion
Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 30, 1999No. 99-5008PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Seven utility companies appeal the dismissal of the action they filed in the Court of Federal Claims. The dismissal order was entered on the government’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Because we conclude that the government is not entitled to judgment at this stage of the case, we reverse and remand.
I
Nuclear power plants require an enriched form of uranium for fuel. The United States government has long provided uranium enrichment services to both domestic and foreign utility companies. Each of the plaintiff utilities in the instant suit entered into a “Utilities…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sandra L. PLEMING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL-RUNDLE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Phillips/May Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- The Baker Group, L.C. v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, - in Re: The Baker Group, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.