Legal Opinion

Schillawski v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1961No. Claim 32769; Claim 32760PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

These appeals, by our permission, involve claims for damages arising out of an alleged de facto appropriation of land for use in the reconstruction of a State highway known as U. S. Route 20, which runs in an easterly-westerly direction between the City of Auburn and the Village of Skaneateles. The subject properties are located on a highway east of Auburn. In the course of the work done in 1951-1952, the two-lane concrete sections of the road were widened from 20 feet to 48 feet. The appellants claim that in performing this work the State encroached on lands owned by them.

In the Court of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. . CaywoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. State v. AuchardMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Pillsbury v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
  5. Mangam v. President & TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wein v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Flacke v. StrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Pardi v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Desmond v. Town of Summit, New York County Courts1975
  5. Dutcher v. Town of ShandakenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API