Legal Opinion

Hertel v. State of Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 4, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01205Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS FRANK K. C. HERTEL, SR., Petitioner, : Case No. 2:19-cv-1205 - vs - District Judge George C. Smith Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz DAVE YOST, Attorney General, State of Ohio, : Respondent. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Frank K.C. Hertel, Sr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition as barred by the statute of limitations (ECF No. 12). Petitioner opposes the Motion (ECF No. 16). The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API