Legal Opinion
Weyel v. Catania
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 16, 1999No. AC 17553PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The defendant, Gregory M. Catania,1 appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, rendered after a bench trial. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) based its decision on various erroneous factual findings, (2) denied qualified immunity to the defendant, (3) denied the defendant’s motion for recu-sal, (4) excluded from evidence part of a hospital record, (5) considered who would likely pay an adverse judgment and (6) awarded attorney’s fees that were premature and excessive. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Wallerstein v. Stew Leonard's DairySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Joyner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Laudano v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Messiah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.