Legal Opinion

Claim of Lu Core v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is an appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which denied the appellants’ application for a rehearing on the basis of newly discovered evidence.

The claimant was injured on March 4, 1953, when chlorine fumes came in contact with his right eye. From that time until August, 1953, when he was discharged as recovered, he was treated by a Dr. Goetzman. In Dr. Goetzman’s reports the vision in the claimant’s right eye varied from 20/20 down to 20/25 and in his final examination it was reported as 20/40. When first examined by Dr. Blair, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Lawrence v. Meyer-Garry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Claim of Carinci v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Matter of Carinci v. Pittston Stevedoring Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Jones v. Burrell Orchards, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API