Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1970No. Civ. 12467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Petitioner, Clarence F. Erickson, seeks annulment of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter, “board”) after reconsideration, in which the board found it was not true that petitioner was injured by reason of serious and willful misconduct on the part of his employer (respondent State of California) or of a managing representative of the employer. The board ordered that petitioner take nothing on his claim for increased benefits. We issued a writ of review.

Erickson, a rotary pressman, sustained injury to both arms and hands arising out of and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Rogers Materials Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Montyk v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. White v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Bigge Crane & Rigging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API