Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Ewing v. a Motion Picture Film Entitled "Without a Stitch"
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1971No. 6877PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPottee, P. J.
This cause is before this court de novo. We have reviewed and weighed the evidence submitted in the court below and in this court. Fortunately, after July 1, 1971, the anomalous practice of one trial and one trial de novo is abolished under Rule 2, Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The case comes to this court on the complaint of the petitioner for an injunction to enjoin the exhibition of the motion picture film, “Without a Stitch,” and to abate the same as a public nuisance in the city of Toledo, Ohio, pursuant to R. C. 3767.01 et seq. Answers were filed by the defendants James Wescott, Art…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LilliockOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Trans-Lux Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- State ex rel. Dowd v. Motion PictureStark County Court of Common Pleas · 1972
- Harmer v. Tonylyn Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Harmer v. Tonylyn Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972