Legal Opinion
Bloomington Urological Associates v. Scaglia
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 21, 1997No. 4-96-1018PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN
delivered the opinion of the court:
In September 1996, the trial court entered an agreed order between defendant, Bennett Scaglia, M.D., and plaintiff, Bloomington Urological Associates, SC (Bloomington Urological), respecting a covenant not to compete. In December 1996, the court found Scaglia in indirect civil contempt for violating the agreed order. Scaglia appeals, arguing that (1) the court’s finding of contempt was against the manifest weight of the evidence; and (2) the court improperly altered the terms of the agreed order after finding him in contempt.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martindell v. Lake Shore National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co. v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Wangelin v. GoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Elliott v. L R S L Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marwaha v. Woodridge Clinic, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Northwest Podiatry Center, LTD. v. OchwatAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Citadel Investment Group, LLC v. Teza Technologies LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- In re M.S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Atlas Asset Management v. KangAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.