Legal Opinion

Leuthold v. Young

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Young, E. E. Fairchild, (his assignee,} the First National Bank of Hasson, and John Fern, from an order of the district court for Dodge county, Buckham, J., presiding, overruling their demurrers to the complaint. To the statement of the substance of the complaint in the opinion, it may be added that the complaint alleges the assignment from Young to Fern to have been made under and pursuant to the provisions of Gen. St. 1878, c. á 1, § 23.

1Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.1

Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to-the complaint. The facts alleged in the complaint are, briefly: The defendant Young kept an elevator at Hasson, in which he received and stored for hire wheat of all grades, belonging to many persons, *123mingling the wheat of the various depositors together, and removing and shipping the same from time to time, and issuing for the wheat deposited storage tickets in the usual form. The bank defendant had an interest in the business of the elevator. The plaintiffs severally deposited wheat in the elevator for storage, and received and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barker v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. Denver Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Alworth v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. McCollister v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Kenaston v. LorigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API