Legal Opinion

Henry v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1988No. 104-83 TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Lacy M. Henry, doing business as Qualified Personnel, brings this action for recovery of Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) and Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and interest thereon, for the periods September 30, *7961975 through June 30, 1979, which he asserts were wrongfully collected. The defendant, the United States of America, maintains that the plaintiff’s lawsuit is barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiff argues, however, that the government should be estopped from reliance on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Tonkonogy v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Southeast Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lacy M. Henry, D/B/A Qualified Personnel v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Chaney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  3. Rocovich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Haas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Harper International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API