Legal Opinion
Buchholz v. City of Oriska
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 2000No. 990364PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul Buchholz appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against the City of Oriska (“the City”). In the trial court, Buchholz challenged the substantive and procedural validity of an ordinance adopted by the City. On appeal, he raises only one issue: whether under N.D.C.C. § 40-05-01(1) the City was required to file a copy of the proposed ordinance in the office of the city auditor prior to its adoption. We conclude the statute contains no such mandate and, therefore, we affirm.
[¶ 2] The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, fully reviewable by this Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Peterson v. Traill CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Kuntz v. MuehlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doyle Ex Rel. Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Meyer v. MausNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Security State Bank of North Dakota v. OrvikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Jorgenson v. Agway, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Nord v. HerrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.