Legal Opinion

Tauzin v. Louisiana Pigment Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 2005No. 04-1107Published

1Opinion of the Court

[ THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case, defendants, Louisiana Pigment and Zurich American Insurance Company, appeal the workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) judgment that plaintiff, Michael Tauzin, sustained an accident in the course and scope of his employment, and that he was entitled to supplemental earnings benefits (SEB). We affirm for the following reasons.

I

ISSUES

We shall consider whether the WCJ was manifestly erroneous in finding that 1) an accident occurred within the course and scope of his employment and 2) Mr. Tauzin was entitled to supplemental earnings…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  4. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API