Gal ex rel. Hagins v. Whetstone
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is an appeal by a non-party witness from an order directing him to attend a deposition and produce certain documents. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground the order is interlocutory and not directly appeala-ble. We grant the motion to dismiss.
An order directing a party to participate in discovery is interlocutory and not directly appealable under S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976). Patterson v. Specter Broadcasting, 287 S. C. 249, 335 S. E. (2d) 803 (1985); Lowndes Products, Inc. v. Brower, 262 S. C. 431, 205 S. E. (2d) 184 (1974). We now hold that an order directing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cisson v. McWhorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Bivens v. KnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Lowndes Products, Inc. v. BrowerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex Parte WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986