Legal Opinion

Urban v. Urban

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Louise and Gary Urban both appeal from the final judgment in their divorce action. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a determination of general alimony.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Urbans were married on January 15, 1972, in Chamberlain, South Dakota. During the marriage, Gary ran the family farm operation. Louise did not work outside the home until 1990, when she began a series of short-*875term jobs, including: being a salesperson for Avon and Tupperware products, a substitute teacher, and a greenhouse manager. She was also employed at St. Joseph Indian School and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bradeen v. BradeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. ZepedaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Dejong v. DejongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Scherer v. SchererSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Fausch v. FauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API