Legal Opinion

Parochial Bus System, Inc. v. Lewisohn

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Section 20-b of the General City Law places limitations on respondent’s power to tax utilities subject to State tax under section 186-a of the Tax Law (Matter of Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. McGoldrick, 270 App. Div. 186, affd. sub nom. Matter of Brooklyn. Union Gas Co. v. Joseph, 298 N. Y. 536; Matter of Carey Transp. v. Perrotta, 34 A D 2d 147, affd. 29 N Y 2d 814). However, no such limitation obtains where the utility is not within the purview of section 186-a (Tax Law, § 1221, subd. [a], par. [3]; 58 N. Y. Jur., Taxation,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Matter of Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Children's Bus Service, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paging Network of New York, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. RLM Transportation Corp. v. Director of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. RLM Transportation Corp. v. Director of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API