Legal Opinion

Alamia v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon review of this record, we conclude that the Commissioner’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, should not be disturbed. (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176.) The Police Department’s sole eyewitness testified that petitioners had attempted to utilize their positions as police officers to solicit oral sex at the Miyako Massage Parlour and, when rebuffed, had gone on a drunken rampage with two others, also police officers, which included the acts of urinating on a table containing food valued at $250 and damaging walls, doors, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ahsaf v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Meyer v. RozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API