Legal Opinion

O'Gorman v. Pfeiffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 1911Published

Appeal by tbe defendant, Minnie Pfeiffer, from an order of tbe Supreme Court, made at tbe New York Special Term and entered in tbe office of the clerk of tbe county of New York on the 18th day of May,-1911,- denying the'defendant’s motion, to strike out certain allegations in the complaint as irrelevant or redundant or both.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

The complaint alleges that tbe plaintiff was married to Joseph P. O’Gorman on the 20th day of February, 1895, and was bis wife until bis death, which occurred on the 13th of March, 1910; that in March, 1902, the defendant alienated the affections of the plaintiff’s husband and induced and willfully and maliciously enticed him to desert plaintiff and harbored and detained him against the will of the plaintiff until his death, and willfully and maliciously debauched him, and she demands damages for $75,000. ' ■

The 4th and 5th allegations of the complaint' are as follows: “ Fourth.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Buchanan v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Romaine v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Kuhn v. HemmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API