Legal Opinion
Dannasch v. Bifulco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 1992PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered September 16, 1991, which granted defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs, plaintiffs complaint is reinstated, without prejudice to renewal of the motion for summary judgment, on appropriate papers.
Defendant is the sole stockholder, officer and director of Zachary Building Corp. (Zachary). Plaintiff entered into a contract with Zachary Building Corp., pursuant to which Zachary was to perform remodeling work at plaintiff’s Long Island home. Zachary left the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ritt v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lazar v. Nico Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by66 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Morse Shoe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. MarchioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Azzopardi v. American Blower Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Eujoy Realty Corp. v. Van Wagner Communications, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.