Legal Opinion
State v. ALMEDINA
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 19, 2010No. AC 29671PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Luis Almedina, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly dismissed his motion on the basis of collateral estoppel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The procedural history of this case was set forth in this court’s opinion in Almedina v. Commissioner of Correction, 109 Conn. App. 1, 950 A.2d 553, cert. denied, 289 Conn. 925, 958 A.2d 150 (2008), in which this court affirmed the habeas…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Almedina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Byars v. BergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Marriage of DorseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. CarterConnecticut Superior Court · 2011
- State v. ALMEDINASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010