Legal Opinion
Grosso v. Board of Adjustment of Millburn Twp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 10, 1948PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The defendant Board of Adjustment denied an application made -by prosecutor for a variance from the terms of the local zoning regulations to permit the use of his lands numbered 16-18 Holmes Street in Millburn, situate in a single-family residence zone, as an autolnobile showroom and service garage, and for leave to erect a suitable structure thereon.
The locus, recently acquired from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Eailroad Company, is a rectangular plot fronting 57 feet on Holmes Street and extending back along the railroad right of way…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hochberg v. Borough of FreeholdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Brazer v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Kingston East Realty Co. v. State of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- E. Rutherford Industrial Park v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- 181 Incorporated v. Salem Cty. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.