Central of Georgia Railroad v. Markert
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge
1.1 concur in the ruling in Division 1 but I am of the opinion that an explanation is in order. It is by not raising below the contention that defendants waived by delay the defense of federal preemption, that plaintiffs/appellees waived the point in this court. “Issues not raised in the court below may not be raised [here] for the first time as they present nothing to this court for decision.” Lester v. Groves, 162 Ga. App. 590, 591 (291 SE2d 785) (1982); Nodvin v. West, 197 Ga. App. 92, 95 (3a) (397 SE2d 581) (1990). The majority cites Phillips v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 121 Ga. App. 342…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright Associates, Inc. v. RiederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Nodvin v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SweatmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Lester v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.