Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Central of Georgia Railroad v. Markert

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1991No. A91A0549Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

1.1 concur in the ruling in Division 1 but I am of the opinion that an explanation is in order. It is by not raising below the contention that defendants waived by delay the defense of federal preemption, that plaintiffs/appellees waived the point in this court. “Issues not raised in the court below may not be raised [here] for the first time as they present nothing to this court for decision.” Lester v. Groves, 162 Ga. App. 590, 591 (291 SE2d 785) (1982); Nodvin v. West, 197 Ga. App. 92, 95 (3a) (397 SE2d 581) (1990). The majority cites Phillips v. State Farm &c. Ins. Co., 121 Ga. App. 342…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright Associates, Inc. v. RiederSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Nodvin v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SweatmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Lester v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API