Legal Opinion

Almendarez v. City of Coppell

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 6, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01160Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION NOHEMI ALMENDAREZ, HOUTEX § (USA) INC., and GLORIOUS SUN § PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (USA), § INC., § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-1160-B § CITY OF COPPELL, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of Coppell (the “City”)’s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(1), or Alternatively, Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 8). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the City’s Motion and REMANDS this case to the 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API