Legal Opinion

Aurelio v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Election Law makes provision for the method of nominations for the Supreme Court by convention and for the filling of vacancies. The convention is limited by the statute. Except by direction of the Supreme Court, the statute contains no provision authorizing the reassembling of a convention after the convention has fulfilled its function. (Matter of Greene, 121 App. Div. 693, 698.) On this appeal, the holding of Special Term that the Board of Elections properly rejected certificates of the reassembled conventions does not appear seriously to be challenged.

The Corporation Counsel says that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Matter of Holley (Rittenberg)New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. In re GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Southard v. McGannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Justice v. GamacheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Marasco v. CouzensNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Van Etten v. MillspaughNew York Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API