Legal Opinion

Knox v. Krueger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1966No. 8325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

The defendants appeal from a judgment quieting title to certain oil and gas royalty interests in the plaintiff. The trial court held that the plaintiff is the owner of 1¼% of all the oil and gas produced from certain of defendants’ lands described in the complaint. A trial de novo is asked in this Court.

It was the contention of the defendants in the trial court, as it is now, that the plaintiff is entitled to have title quieted in 1¼% of ⅛⅛ of all the oil and gas produced from said lands.

The primary issue is the interpretation to be placed upon an assignment of royalty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McDonald v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Harriss v. RitterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Corbett v. La BereNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Trengen v. MongeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ogren v. SandakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API