Legal Opinion

Baker v. Zelem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Paul A. Zelem and Carol McKelvey appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered March 27, 1992, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *618on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff Douglas Baker has failed to establish a prima facie case that he sustained "serious injury” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Tipping-Cestari v. KilhennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Grotzer v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. O'Neill v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crespo v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Orr v. MinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Raugalas v. Chase Manhattan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Berman v. General Electric Cap AutoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Bunce v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API