Legal Opinion

Brown v. Incorporated Town of Chillicothe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. C. W. Ver-ümillion, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries received by reason of a fall on a sidewalk. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

Error is assigned on tbe overruling of a motion to require plaintiff to make his petition more specific *641as to tbe nature and character of the hole or defect in the 1. pleadings: motion to make specific, sidewalk of which he complains, as to the alie- » i -i .. . . gationthat, while he was in the exercise of ordinary care, “his attention was diverted and temporarily distracted from the sidewalk along which he was walking,” and that he received permanent injuries.- We do not see that there was any occasion to require plaintiff to describe with any greater particularity the nature of the hole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cosner v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Millspaugh Laundry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorman v. Credit Reference & Reporting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Balcom v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Platts v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Robertson v. City of WaukonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API