State v. Turner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of illegal possession of narcotics and appealed.
The first two assignments of error relate to the-instructions of the court. In neither instance was the matter now complained of called to the trial court’s attention either by a requested instruction or by an exception to instructions given. Errors not raised or preserved in the trial court will not be reviewed on appeal in the absence of manifest injustice. State v. Avent, 209 Or 181, 183, 302 P2d 549 (1956). The matters raised by the defendant’s first two assignments of error are not of that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blakely v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
- Turner v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970