Legal Opinion

State v. Turner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of illegal possession of narcotics and appealed.

The first two assignments of error relate to the-instructions of the court. In neither instance was the matter now complained of called to the trial court’s attention either by a requested instruction or by an exception to instructions given. Errors not raised or preserved in the trial court will not be reviewed on appeal in the absence of manifest injustice. State v. Avent, 209 Or 181, 183, 302 P2d 549 (1956). The matters raised by the defendant’s first two assignments of error are not of that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Turner v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API