Commonwealth v. Spetzer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*19 OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice CASTILLE.
The issue on appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in granting a new trial on grounds that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object, under the spousal confidential communications privilege set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5914, to the voluntary testimony of appellee’s wife relating statements appellee made to her while charges were pending against him for the rape of his twelve year-old stepdaughter, B.G. The challenged statements, many of which were recorded by police with appellee’s wife’s consent, included: (1) admissions to having raped B.G.;…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. MattisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- B.K. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.