Legal Opinion

Everybody's Drug Company v. Duckworth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1958No. 6402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This case involves both an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment entered by the. trial court: (1) granting to plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter called plaintiff) a permanent injunction against defendantappellee (hereinafter called defendant) enjoining defendant, his agents, etc., from advertising, offering for sale or selling certain products of “Mead-Johnson & Co.” and certain products of “Proctor & Gamble”.for .less than the fair trade price thereof as fixed by a fair trade market agreement between said producers and defendant and a like agreement between said producers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. General Electric Co. v. Telco Supply, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. Super City Department Stores of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. La Sota v. Arizona Licensed Beverage Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. City of Bridgeton v. GilstrapSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API