Legal Opinion

In re Bult

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 21, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. 88-03672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

M. DEE McGARITY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This motion for relief from the automatic stay was filed on behalf of a creditor, New London Savings & Loan Association (“New London”). A final hearing on the motion was held on October 26, 1988. At that hearing, the court found that if New London has a valid perfected security interest in the property in question, there is no equity in the property. The court also found that the property is not necessary for an effective reorganization. Mr. Bult was no longer practicing law, and his plans for future use of the building were too speculative. (See court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Martin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Seymour v. BriggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Huntzicker v. DangersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re WickersheimUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API