Legal Opinion
Brady v. Department of Motor Vehicles
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) charged petitioner with violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392, which provides that “[a]ny person * * * who shall deceive * * * in connection with any examination * * * shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that petitioner committed such deception in connection with the written portion of a Commercial Driver’s License test when, contrary to DMV’s test procedures and explicit directions, he left the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnes v. TofanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Richmond Hill Service Station, Inc. v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Brady v. Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cipry Automotive, Inc. v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Watson v. FialaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Brown v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Herskovic v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- WATSON, CHARLES E. v. FIALA, BARBARA J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.