Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Deering

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1927No. 1738PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

Since tlxe original submission iii the above entitled matter reported in 29 Haw. 854, the agreed statement of facts therein referred to has been amended to sIioav “that the testatrix, Mary Wentworth Peering, died possessed of articles of jeAvelry in addition to those articles of jewelry specifically bequeathed by her will and in excess of what will he necessary to permit the executors to comply with the direction of the testatrix to give each of the certain persons named in the will one article of jewelry selected by the executors thereof; that the said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Brandon v. YeakleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. In Re the Estate of DeeringHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  4. In re GemmellDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Dox's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In re the Trust Estate of HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  5. In Re the Trust Estate Created by WeillHawaii Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API