Legal Opinion

Philpott v. Philpott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1933No. 22919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the district court of Hughes county, Okla., hy the defendant in error, and on the 23d day of February, 1931, the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and against the defendant below for divorce and ordered that $100 attorney fees be paid and $1,050 alimony.

Thereafter motion for alimony pending-suit was filed in this court by the defendant in error, and on May 2, 1933, this court entered its order directing the plaintiff in error to pay the defendant in error $50 for expense money and $100 attorney fees within ten days from that date.

On May 16, 1933, a motion…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Burt v. BurtWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Willhoit v. WillhoitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Hardin v. HardinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Key v. KeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API