Cadwell v. Pray

The plaintiff sued the defendants jointly for the conversion of certain goods, and recovered judgment, in the circuit court for the county of Ingham.

The suit grows out of the litigation in the case of Pray v. Cadwell, 50 Mich. 222.

The undisputed facts leading up to the j>resent controversy are briefly as follows: In April, 1878, Orman 0. Pray held a note and chattel mortgage against Marvin S. Cadwell, upon which the sum of $600 was due. The note and mortgage were originally given by Cadwell to the defendant John A. Barrington, who had guaranteed the collection of the same to Pray. A day or…