Day v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
Appellant was convicted of carrying on the business of a wholesale liquor dealer, and of carrying on the business of a retail liquor dealer, in violation of section 3281 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 193), and of concealing and aiding in concealing distilled spirits, in violation of section 3296 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 404).
At the trial testimony was given by two deputy sheriffs to the effect that they .had a search warrant issued from a state court and under it they had made a search of a smokehouse, situated about 15 feet from the appellant’s residence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. SalliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Nations v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Wolstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.