Legal Opinion

Maltese Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1959No. Appeal, No. 209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the claimant was demed benefits under the provision that, “Ms unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature . . .” Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b). The Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee and the Board of Review, all, so decided.

The board found that the claimant, Carolyn M. Maltese, was last employed as a file clerk by the Curtis Publishing Company, PMladelpMa, Pennsylvania; that her last day of work was April 12, 1957; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flannick Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Antinopoulas Unemployment Compensation Case Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Burton Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forsman v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. Grier v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Eckley Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API