Legal Opinion

Blake v. Hogan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The record, in our view, supports the conclusion — reached by the Appellate Division when it denied the petitioners-appellants ’ motion in the criminal case to dismiss the indictment —that there had been no denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial in view of the fact that they had acquiesced in the delay complained of. On the procedural issue, we do not believe that the extraordinary remedy of prohibition is proper under the circumstances of this case.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Carey v. KitsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Forte v. Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API