Legal Opinion

Arter v. Southern Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1930No. 3864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the case as above).

The contention first presented in appellant’s brief is that the court below erred when he overruled the plea and exceptions questioning the jurisdiction of said court to hear and determine appellees’ appeal from the award of the Industrial Accident Board. One ground of the contention, and the only one we have considered, is that it appeared no notice of such an appeal was given by the appellee Southern Surety Company, and that the notice given by the Southern Surety Company of New York was ineffective because it appeared it was not an “interested party”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Harris v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Bolden v. GreerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. La FairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. DurbinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Texas Reciprocal Ins. Ass'n v. LegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API