Legal Opinion
Sturgell v. Grand Union Tea Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error: Court of Appeals for Franklin county.
1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.
The Grand Union Tea Company entered into an agreement with Chris Sturgell whereby it agreed to consign certain goods, chiefly coffee, tea, spices and groceries, which he was to sell for it on commission. To guarantee his faithful performance of the contract he gave a bond in the sum of $500, which Gabelman, Myers and Douglas executed as sureties. It was conditioned upon the faithful performance by him of the agreement.
After the termination of his employment in February, 1915, an action was brought in the municipal court of Columbus. It was taken to the court of common pleas of Franklin county…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McShane v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- United American Fire Insurance Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Bissell v. . SaxtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Federal Union Surety Co. v. Indiana Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lichter v. S. T. Kenyon Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
- Bertolini Bros. v. MayOhio Court of Appeals · 1929