Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Armstrong

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 2002No. 36,514-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJjDREW, J.

The parties having stipulated’ to liability and insurance coverage, the primary trial issue was quantum. Floyd Taylor and his wife, Doris, sued for their damages arising out of a rear-end collision which occurred while they were stopped at an intersection. The driver of the other car, George Armstrong and his insurer, Republic Vanguard Insurance Company (defendants), appealed complaining that the trial court awarded excessive damages. For the following reasons, the judgment is amended and affirmed.

Finding Mrs. Taylor’s injury (a cervical sprain and a left shoulder sprain which had resolved)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bozeman v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Cole v. PoolLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rice v. LilesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API