Legal Opinion

POE & BROWN OF GEORGIA, INC. v. Gill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1997No. S97A0572PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

The appellant, Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc., filed this action to enforce a restrictive covenant in an employment contract against the appellee, Bobby Gregg Gill. Poe & Brown appeals from the trial court’s order denying Poe & Brown’s request for an interlocutory injunction to prohibit Gill from soliciting customers of Poe & Brown. Without ruling on the enforceability of the restrictive covenant, 1 the trial court concluded that Poe & Brown had an adequate remedy at law, and it thus denied interlocutory injunctive relief. Based upon the record presented to this Court, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rash v. Toccoa Clinic Medical AssociatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Sherrer v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Bailey v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Rife v. CorbettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. FrisbyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
  3. UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC. v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Bijou Salon & Spa, LLC v. Kensington Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. TMX Finance Holdings, Inc. v. Drummond Financial Services, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API