POE & BROWN OF GEORGIA, INC. v. Gill
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
The appellant, Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc., filed this action to enforce a restrictive covenant in an employment contract against the appellee, Bobby Gregg Gill. Poe & Brown appeals from the trial court’s order denying Poe & Brown’s request for an interlocutory injunction to prohibit Gill from soliciting customers of Poe & Brown. Without ruling on the enforceability of the restrictive covenant, 1 the trial court concluded that Poe & Brown had an adequate remedy at law, and it thus denied interlocutory injunctive relief. Based upon the record presented to this Court, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rash v. Toccoa Clinic Medical AssociatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Sherrer v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Bailey v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Rife v. CorbettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. FrisbyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC. v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Bijou Salon & Spa, LLC v. Kensington Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- TMX Finance Holdings, Inc. v. Drummond Financial Services, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.