Legal Opinion

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 2, 2020No. 3:20-cv-03343Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 10 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Docket No. 24 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. (“Fortinet”) brought this action against Defendant Forescout 16 Technologies, Inc. (“Forescout”) for patent infringement. Fortinet owns three patents relating to 17 cybersecurity technology that, it alleges, Forescout has indirectly and willfully infringed. Pending 18 before…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API