Force v. AMERITECH CORP., INC.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [31]
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s September 5, 2006 Report and Recommendation [31]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including Defendant’s Objections, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiffs motion for judgment reversing administrative decision denying ERISA benefits [24] is GRANTED, and Defendant’s motion for entry of judgment [25] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
REPORT…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Force v. Ameritech Corp IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Veryzer v. American International Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Nuffer v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021