People v. Ragan

Pee Curiam.

After being arrested as an accomplice in a jewelry store robbery, defendant was convicted in a non-jury trial of larceny over $100.* He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The record, as here, contains evidence supportin the verdict; an appellate court will not disturb judgment grounded on the tacit determination by the trial judge that the evidence supported the verdict. People v. Szymanski (1948), 321 Mich 248; People v. Dolphus (1966), 2 Mich App 229.

Conviction affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and McGregor and V. J. Brennan,…