Legal Opinion

Paull v. Paull

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1957No. Appeal, No. 46PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The provision in paragraph 3 of the decree appealed from, which imposes a lien of Us pendens on real estate owned by the defendant, Charles T. Pauli, and his wife by the entireties to secure the payments ordered by paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decree to be made by Charles T. Pauli, individually, to Leo L. Pauli, plaintiff, was beyond the power of the court below to decree. Accordingly, paragraph 3 of the decree is hereby declared to be invalid and of no effect.

As so modified, the decree is affirmed at the appellee’s costs.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Century 21 Daystar Inc. v. Phillips, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1990
  2. Shannon v. Barrett, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1974