Legal Opinion

People v. Dunley

California Court of Appeal, 4th District

Decided April 4, 2016No. E062656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcKINSTER, J.

*695The Mentally Disordered Offenders Act (Pen.Code, § 2960 et seq. )1 provides for involuntary civil commitment as a condition of parole for prisoners who are found to have "a severe mental disorder" if certain conditions are met. (§ 2962, subds. (a)-(f).)2 The commitment is for a *696term of one year and may be extended annually for an additional year on petition of the district attorney. (§ 2972, subds. (a), (b).)

Appellant Eddie Dunley appeals from a judgment extending his commitment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). He contends that because persons subject to civil commitment after being…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Amber G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Am. Cargo Express, Inc. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API