Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lafary v. Kindred

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 2007No. 55A04-0607-CV-396Published

1DissentCrone, Judge

I agree with the Lafarys that “where, as here, a parent files a petition to terminate a nonparent’s guardianship over a child, the burden of proving that a guardianship is no longer necessary should rest with the parent.” Op. at 692 (citing Harris, 149 Ind.App. 512, 273 N.E.2d 779). Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority notes, our supreme court held in Guardianship of B.H. that

before placing a child in the custody of a person other than the natural parent, a trial court must be satisfied by clear and convincing evidence that the best interests of the child require such a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muncie Building Trades Council v. UmbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Harris v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API